3rd Party Models/Media Chat / fbx imported to gg results

Author
Message
imothep85
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Mar 2006
Location: Belgium
Posted: 25th Jun 2018 09:04 Edited at: 25th Jun 2018 10:43
after a week of testing modeling texturing and importing in fbx or x format this is what i got

So like i said PBR materials are not working well inside gg the results are pretty far from what i was expecting to have.

i modeled a rock, textured and then i did tons of imports/exports test but no one was successful inside gg.
so i got the help of Pirate Myke i sended him my différents meshes and textures and this is the result he got.
you can see teh result is really really far from pbr, and really far from something of quality for a game.
you can see the result of Pirate Myke ( thanks by the way for your help ) inside gg and my pbr material inside 3d coat.
i know we gg is not full pbr, but for me pbr is not working at all !
and you can also see what it looks when i import the fbx inside gg, some bugs in menus and object inside the scene
we still have the divisions seams visibles in textures even with preservetangents = 1 inside the fpe file, for me it's definitely a bug in gg.

Attachments

Login to view attachments
Ertlov
GameGuru BOTB Developer
17
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 18th Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posted: 25th Jun 2018 12:26
Puh, the 3Dcoat pic is also far from being perfect.

What's your UV layout looking like?
"I am a road map, I will lead and you will follow, I will teach and you will learn, when you leave my sprint planning you will be weapons, focused and full of JIRA tickets, Hot Rod rocket development gods of precision and strength, terrorizing across the repository and hunting for github submits."
Belidos
3D Media Maker
8
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Nov 2015
Playing: The Game
Posted: 25th Jun 2018 12:36 Edited at: 25th Jun 2018 12:38
Quote: "What's your UV layout looking like?"


Careful, i asked him that and he got stroppy.

But, believe me, i saw the UV he posted and it wasn't great, in fact it wasn't even good.
[img]belidos3d.swgrp.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/blogo.png[/img]
Primary Desktop:
i7 7700,k NV1070 8GB, 16GB 3200mhz memory, 1x 2TB Hybrid, Win10.

Secondary Desktop:
i5 4760k, NV960 2GB, 16GB 2333mhz memory, 1x 2TB Hybrid, Win10.

Laptop:
i3, Intel 4000 series graphics, 6GB memory, 1x 500gb HDD, Win8.1.
cybernescence
GameGuru Master
11
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 28th Jan 2013
Playing: Cogwheel Chronicles
Posted: 25th Jun 2018 13:59
Might need to break this down into separate areas to work through: fbx importer and pbr.

For me pbr assets work really well but I have not used the new importer. I use ultimate unwrap to change fbx to x then create/check the textures in fragmo.

So I can tell you pbr works (though we know some lighting aspects can improve).

I can also say the models work fine in the way I create or import them with those two tools.

So perhaps it is the new fbx importer or the way you are creating the models that is causing the issue. Of course ideally we would just use the importer alone and it would all work great straight away - that’s what Lee is working to make happen.

So I just tested both static and animated fbx models I purchased and both have gone in fine using the importer thought I did have to make the pbr textures fit the way GG expects them (named color, gloss as roughness, etc).

It’s not a lot of consolation for you as it can be frustrating when things don’t work but pbr fbx imports do work for some models. I guess need to find out why they don’t with your work flow but if Myke can’t see the issue might be tricky but I can also try and have a look for you if you want.

Cheers.
imothep85
18
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Mar 2006
Location: Belgium
Posted: 25th Jun 2018 14:01
like i said before the uvw are made by 3dcoat qith auto uvw, i export my mesh from 3ds max to 3d coat where uvw are applied then i add a material and re-export.
Belidos
3D Media Maker
8
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 23rd Nov 2015
Playing: The Game
Posted: 25th Jun 2018 14:43
Quote: "the uvw are made by 3dcoat qith auto uvw,"


There's at least part of the issue. Never use the auto option in any modelling program for UV's, always do it manually, most 3D modelling programs don't make very good auto UV's.
[img]belidos3d.swgrp.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/blogo.png[/img]
Primary Desktop:
i7 7700,k NV1070 8GB, 16GB 3200mhz memory, 1x 2TB Hybrid, Win10.

Secondary Desktop:
i5 4760k, NV960 2GB, 16GB 2333mhz memory, 1x 2TB Hybrid, Win10.

Laptop:
i3, Intel 4000 series graphics, 6GB memory, 1x 500gb HDD, Win8.1.
synchromesh
Forum Support
10
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 24th Jan 2014
Location:
Posted: 25th Jun 2018 15:25 Edited at: 25th Jun 2018 15:34
Ok this kind of belongs in 3rdparty Models and Media chat as its getting pretty in depth.
Moved to 3rd Party Models/Media chat.
The only person ever to get all his work done by "Friday" was Robinson Crusoe..
PM
granada
Forum Support
21
Years of Service
User Offline
Joined: 27th Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posted: 26th Jun 2018 00:02
As Belidos says auto uv is only ok for basic, chose the unwrap that best suits your model box ect unwrap the model and then do the rest by hand. Use the checker texture when uv mapping to help with scaling alignment ect.

Dave
Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
AMD FX (tm)-9590 Eight-core Processor
31.96 GB RAM
1920x1080,60 Hz
PM

Login to post a reply

Server time is: 2024-04-26 02:21:04
Your offset time is: 2024-04-26 02:21:04